In a comparison of system, the University of Michigan-Flint and Carman-Ainsworth have just as many similarities as differences.  A major difference is that Carman-Ainsworth has no student log-in.  This makes it difficult to track individual computer use or abuse. An important part of computer use, I feel is responsibility.  The act of logging-in and remembering your user name and password are important factors in using a computer system in college and the workplace, and these things should be used in all schools and networked systems. The networking is also different, Carman-Ainsworth is using Novell, whereas UM-Flint has just upgraded to Windows XP.   System requirements change depending on the application, so it is necessary to have multiple labs and networks designed for specific purposes. The University has 8 drives from which information is stored and accessed.  Students at the University of Michigan-Flint have a personal drive which can hold up to 50Mb of data and can be accessed from anywhere on the internet.  This is a feature Carman-Ainsworth does not have.  They do have 6 mapped drives that support differing areas of the network. Data can be saved to these directories by students for access by all students, but there is no place besides a floppy or CD drive to save individual work for individual access.  This can be a valuable asset for students.  I have seen problems arise when saving to floppy discs and CDs, and a networked place to save information can help save you from losing the data, loosing the disc, and it can make the data accessible from home or anywhere else the Internet is accessible.  I encourage students to double save or “back up” their work.  A secured network drive for data storage can be a valuable resource for saving, or retrieving information that can be lost or corrupted.
   Another difference in computing systems between the University of Michigan-Flint and Carman-Ainsworth is the use of Apple Macintosh computers.  A lot of musical and graphical Apple application software is considered better and used by more and more businesses. The real issue between Mac and PC is not which is better. The technology industry is reaching a usability plateau. Both platforms are just as capable. For schools the real issue is the future, what will children use in their field. In the end, it comes down to having all the tools available to prepare students for their careers.