Evaluation
This rubric will be used to evaluate your work.
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Content
|
No relevance to the assigned topic. |
Information was inaccurate. |
Most of the content was accurate. Some information was inaccurate. |
All content was accurate. |
|
|
Resources
|
No credible resources cited. |
Only used commercial websites information about products and benefits. |
Used resources from recognized organizations. |
Used resources from professional journals and organizations with a research base. |
|
|
Writing
|
Poorly written, poorly organized: difficult to understand the main message or argument. |
Lacks details and examples to back-up main points. Organization is not clear. Difficult to understand. |
Provides details, some examples, and some forms of evidence which address the issues and requirements of the task. Report is organized. |
Provides details, examples, and various forms of evidence which address the issues and requirements of the task. Well written and organized. |
|
|
Rationale |
No rationale for recommendations stated. |
Rationale lacked proof of consideration of the elements of the tools recommended. |
Good rationale, proof of consideration of the elements of the tools recommended present. |
Rationale clearly stated, strong proof of consideration of the elements of the tools recommended. |
|
|
Presentation |
Poor presentation: read information to audience, no/very little interaction with audience. |
Fair Presentation: lacked involvement with audience. |
Good presentation: presented information in an informational format. |
Great presentation skills: spoke clearly, maintained eye contact, engaged audience. |